homeabout uspress releasesstudiesmediaMonitor
'America's pre-eminent news analysts' ... Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences

news media studies

entertainment studies

election 2004

network news studies

political humor

our methodology

cmpa publications

support cmpa

employment opportunities

praise

cmpa staff

contact us

CMPA ElectionWatch Study in the White House Bulletin

(October 19)

Study Finds National Television News Programs Increasing Coverage Of Policy Issues

 

The Center for Media and Public Affairs (CMPA) is expected to release its analysis today of the television news media’s coverage of the presidential campaign so far. Compared to 2000, media coverage of issues has increased notably. However, viewership is increasingly fragmented among the different television outlets as Fox has changed the dynamic in political coverage. Today’s CMPA study charted coverage of the major nightly news programs on ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox, comparing 2004 to 2000.

Describing the findings of the study, Matthew Felling, CMPA’s Media Director, told the Bulletin, “Our study is a good news, bad news story. It’s great that the networks are defying conventional wisdom and covering hard news more in this campaign. We’re taking a break from celebrity trials and moving to a more informed populace. It’s also a sign that the major campaign themes, while still negative, have been issue-oriented. You can’t cover Bush’s charges of Kerry’s flip-flopping without looking into his voting record; likewise, you can’t cover Kerry’s policy alternatives without looking closely at Bush’s stances.”

Felling added, “On the other hand, our study shows the increasing Balkanization of the news media. Whether you’re looking at the varying depictions of Bush across the networks, or the divide between the networks and Fox News Channel in covering Kerry, it’s distressing that the candidate you see depends more on who’s reporting the news and less on who’s watching it.”

Among the findings of the CMPA analysis are:

· “More News - Network news campaign coverage in September was up 40% over 2000 - 199 stories vs. 141.”

· “More Beef - The proportion of stories covering the campaign horse race dropped from 62% in 2000 to only 23% this year…. Meanwhile, the proportion of stories dealing with policy issues rose from 50% in 2000 to 53% in 2004.”

· More Beefs - Both candidates are getting more negative coverage than their counterparts in 2000. Evaluations were only 38% positive toward Kerry and 29% positive toward Bush, compared to 48% positive toward Gore and 33% positive toward Bush in 2000.”

· “Bite Size News - Candidate sound bites averaged under eight seconds in length.”

· “More Differences - All three networks gave Kerry 38% positive evaluations. But ABC gave Bush only 20% positive, compared to 30% at NBC and 35% at CBS.”

· “Bent Toward Bush? - Fox News Channel’s ‘Special Report’ featured 31% positive evaluations of Bush compared to 21% positive toward Kerry. And Fox panelists’ comments favored Bush by 50% positive to only 13% positive toward Kerry.”

· “’Fair and Balanced’? - In ‘Special Report’ news segments, the coverage was balanced - 27% positive for Bush and 24% for Kerry. Fox was also more balanced in its issue coverage (30% positive for Bush vs. 28% for Kerry) than the broadcast network (41% positive for Kerry vs. 23% positive for Bush).”