homeabout uspress releasesstudiesmediaMonitor
'America's pre-eminent news analysts' ... Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences

news media studies

entertainment studies

election 2004

network news studies

political humor

our methodology

cmpa publications

support cmpa

employment opportunities

praise

cmpa staff

contact us

CMPA Talking Points (March 24th)

 

Howard Stern: The New Ralph Nader?

 

With Howard Stern tossing Bush-loathing into his morning mix of porn starlets and bathroom humor, could the self-anointed “King of All Media” impact the election in the same way many Americans believe Ralph Nader cost Al Gore the White House?

It’s not as far-fetched as you think.  Here's why:

For all the ink spilled over Ralph Nader’s candidacy in 2000, he still received under 2.9 million votes, which was enough in many peoples’ minds to swing the election to President George W. Bush. And a large portion of Nader’s support has backed away from him, still feeling burnt over the 2000 results.

Howard Stern has somewhere between 8 million and 9 million extremely loyal listeners on an average morning. At the behest of their longtime radio idol, it’s conceivable that a large number of Stern listeners could go to the ballot booths—some for the first time in years—and vote for Senator John Kerry.

Being a morning rush hour deejay could also work to Stern’s advantage. He would simply need to ask his listeners to leave for work a half-hour early on Election Day (maybe by offering air-time to callers who went out and voted) to help support Stern’s cause. It’s a ready-made constituency—and a potential barrier to re-election for President Bush.

 

--Matthew T. Felling, Media Director, CMPA